Re: [cpuops cmpxchg V2 5/5] cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoidlock semantics

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On 12/16/2010 07:19 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 08:14 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>
>> Are you okay with the patches currently in percpu#for-next?  If so,
>> I'll regenerate patches with your acked-by and pop the two previously
>> mentioned commits and proceed with the rest of the series.
> 
> Still looking through them (sorry.)  I note that we probably do need to
> get Christoph's followup patches into -tip, so we need to get it all
> into tip; as such, even if it goes through your tree I'll need to pull
> it into a tip branch.

Yeah, no problem.  Pekka also wants to pull the essential part into
the memory allocator part, so I think it would be best to keep at
least the proper percpu part and x86 specific ops in percpu tree tho.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/