Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: phy: Fixed some checkpatch errors

[Joe Perches]

On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 19:41 +0100, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> Fixes some coding style issues (errors and warnings).

Hi Jean-Michel.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
[]
> @@ -47,11 +47,11 @@ void phy_print_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
>  	pr_info("PHY: %s - Link is %s", dev_name(&phydev->dev),
>  			phydev->link ? "Up" : "Down");
>  	if (phydev->link)
> -		printk(" - %d/%s", phydev->speed,
> +		pr_info(" - %d/%s", phydev->speed,
>  				DUPLEX_FULL == phydev->duplex ?
>  				"Full" : "Half");
>  
> -	printk("\n");
> +	pr_info("\n");

This isn't the right way to fix this actually.

The first pr_info is not terminated with a newline,
so the second printk should be printk(KERN_CONT or
pr_cont instead.

Ideally, you would make a different change.
There should be just one printk/pr_info.
Fewer messages, couldn't be interleaved with other
simultaneous output, easier to grep, etc...

I think something like this would be better:

 	if (phydev->link)
		pr_info("PHY: %s - Link is down\n", dev_name(&phydev->dev));
	else
		pr_info("PHY: %s - Link is up - %d/%s\n",
			dev_name(&phydev->dev),
			phydev->speed,
			phydev->duplex == DUPLEX_FULL ? "Full" : "Half");

or maybe use dev_info like this:

 	if (phydev->link)
		dev_info(&phydev->dev, "PHY: Link is down\n");
	else
		dev_info(&phydev->dev, "PHY: Link is up - %d/%s\n",
			 phydev->speed,
			 phydev->duplex == DUPLEX_FULL ? "Full" : "Half");

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/