[PATCH net-2.6] sundance: Fix oopses with corrupted skb_shared_info

From: Jarek Poplawski
Date: Sat Dec 25 2010 - 10:12:30 EST


[Was: Help: major pppoe regression since 2.6.35 (panic on first ppp
conection)?]

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 01:51:05PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote:
> Hello Jarek,
Hello Joel,
...
> I don't have any more warnings :<)
>
> Awesome job.

Awesome help.

Thanks and Happy New Year to you as well!
Jarek P.
-------------->

[PATCH net-2.6] sundance: Fix oopses with corrupted skb_shared_info

Joel Soete reported oopses at the beginning of pppoe connections since
v2.6.35. After debugging the bug was found in sundance skb allocation
and dma mapping code, where skb_reserve() bytes aren't taken into
account. This is an old bug, only uncovered by some change in 2.6.35.

Initial debugging patch by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>

Reported-by: Joel Soete <soete.joel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Joel Soete <soete.joel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
---

diff --git a/drivers/net/sundance.c b/drivers/net/sundance.c
index 3ed2a67..b409d7e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sundance.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sundance.c
@@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ static void init_ring(struct net_device *dev)

/* Fill in the Rx buffers. Handle allocation failure gracefully. */
for (i = 0; i < RX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
- struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(np->rx_buf_sz);
+ struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(np->rx_buf_sz + 2);
np->rx_skbuff[i] = skb;
if (skb == NULL)
break;
@@ -1407,7 +1407,7 @@ static void refill_rx (struct net_device *dev)
struct sk_buff *skb;
entry = np->dirty_rx % RX_RING_SIZE;
if (np->rx_skbuff[entry] == NULL) {
- skb = dev_alloc_skb(np->rx_buf_sz);
+ skb = dev_alloc_skb(np->rx_buf_sz + 2);
np->rx_skbuff[entry] = skb;
if (skb == NULL)
break; /* Better luck next round. */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/