Re: x86: Use this_cpu_has for thermal_interrupt

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 12/30/2010 03:29 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 04:56:19PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 12/18/2010 07:35 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> On 12/16/2010 07:13 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>>> It is more effective to use a segment prefix instead of calculating the
>>>> address of the current cpu area amd then testing flags.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> For this and the other x86 patch.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> I suppose these two x86 patches and the gameport one would go through
>>> the x86 tree, right?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, as long as I can get a stable base to pull into -tip.
> 
> I suppose I should take the two x86 and the gameport patches here into
> percpu tree with your ACKs too.  Would that be okay with you?
> 

Yes, please.

Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/