Re: [sodaville] [PATCH 02/11] x86: Add device tree support
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Mon Jan 03 2011 - 11:05:53 EST
On 12/30/2010 12:58 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Right, but in all of those cases a boot wrapper provides the same
> functionality with better flexability, such as being able to provided
> the dtb image(s) at install time instead of compile time.
Assuming the boot wrapper is written correctly. I have seen a number of
cases in which it was not, and it being "already locked into firmware"
and not changeable.
It's a nice theory. And in theory, theory and practice agree.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/