Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-scale tree with the v9fstree

From: Nick Piggin
Date: Tue Jan 04 2011 - 00:52:51 EST

On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:40:54PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Nick,
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-scale tree got a conflict in
> fs/9p/vfs_inode.c between commit 3d21652a1d23591e7f0bbbbedae29ce78c2c1113
> ("fs/9p: Move dotl inode operations into a seperate file") from the v9fs
> tree and various commits from the vfs-scale tree.
> I fixed it up by using the v9fs changes to that file and then applying
> the following merge fixup patch (which I can carry as necessary).

Thanks Stephen.

> Someone will need to fix this up before one of these trees is merged by
> Linus, or to send this merge fix to Linus.

If Linus does pull vfs-scale, and if it is before the v9fs tree, I can
help with the conversion. Otherwise I will be happy to fix up fallout
in my tree.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at