Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 0/3] directed yield for Pause Loop Exiting
From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Tue Jan 04 2011 - 01:42:32 EST
A couple questions.
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:26 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> When running SMP virtual machines, it is possible for one VCPU to be
> spinning on a spinlock, while the VCPU that holds the spinlock is not
> currently running, because the host scheduler preempted it to run
> something else.
Do you have any numbers?
If I were to, say, run a 256 CPU VM on my quad, would this help me get
more hackbench or whatever oomph from my (256X80386/20:) box?
> Both Intel and AMD CPUs have a feature that detects when a virtual
> CPU is spinning on a lock and will trap to the host.
Does an Intel Q6600 have this trap gizmo (iow will this do anything at
all for my little box if I were to try it out).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/