Re: [patch 8/8] fs: add i_op->sync_inode

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Tue Jan 04 2011 - 04:25:52 EST


On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 07:31:32PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> And actually I think it is much better to have sync_inode, which means
> we'll be able to get rid of commit_metadata (which should be an inode
> operation anyway, not an export operation which really should deal with
> exporting filesystems to a non-vfs namespace, not nfsd hacks).
>
> commit_metadata would just be sync_inode with a null range or no data
> sync flag set.

As explained in the previous mail it's not just not writing data, it's
conceptually quite different from fsync.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/