Re: [PATCH 0/2] Annotate gpio-configuration with __must_check
From: Greg KH
Date: Tue Jan 04 2011 - 15:27:34 EST
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:51:06PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Here is a small series generating a lot of warnings, especially in board
> bringup-files. Still, I think it is worthwhile to be strict about checking
> return values of gpio-configuration-functions. My suggestion to keep the noise
> a bit lower is to put it into linux-next for one cycle and then merge it for
> 2.6.39? That should give people some time to fix the issues in time. Looking
> forward to comments.
It's ok to add this type of thing, but please, go through and fix the
warnings at the same time. Otherwise it's a bit rude to force others to
fix their code for something that you did.
Care to also send those patches along?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/