Re: [RFC patch 2/5] trace event skb fix unassigned field

From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Tue Jan 04 2011 - 19:40:48 EST


* Frederic Weisbecker (fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:46:06PM -0500, nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Acked- by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
> >
> > ----- Reply message -----
> > From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue, Jan 4, 2011 6:16 pm
> > Subject: [RFC patch 2/5] trace event skb fix unassigned field
> > To: "LKML" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@xxxxxxx>, "Neil Horman" <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > The field "protocol" in event kfree_skb is left unassigned if skb is NULL,
> > leaving its trace output as garbage. Assign the value to 0 when skb is NULL
> > instead.
>
> Hm, if the skb is already null, we probably shouldn't send any trace.
>
> What about using TP_CONDITION() ?

Hrm, let's see. It's been introduced by commit
5cb3d1d9d34ac04bcaa2034139345b2a5fea54c1
by Zhaolei.

Event at the time of that commit, the only caller looked like:

void kfree_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if (unlikely(!skb))
return;
if (likely(atomic_read(&skb->users) == 1))
smp_rmb();
else if (likely(!atomic_dec_and_test(&skb->users)))
return;
trace_kfree_skb(skb, __builtin_return_address(0));
__kfree_skb(skb);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfree_skb);

So it already checks for a null pointer before calling the tracepoint. This
leads me to wonder why why this check was added in the first place ?

Mathieu

>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> > CC: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/trace/events/skb.h | 4 +---
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > @@ -25,9 +25,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
> >
> > TP_fast_assign(
> > __entry->skbaddr = skb;
> > - if (skb) {
> > - __entry->protocol = ntohs(skb->protocol);
> > - }
> > + __entry->protocol = skb ? ntohs(skb->protocol) : 0;
> > __entry->location = location;
> > ),
> >
> >
> >

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/