Re: [PATCH 2/2] jump label: introduce static_branch()

From: David Daney
Date: Wed Jan 05 2011 - 14:32:51 EST


On 01/05/2011 11:14 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:

* H. Peter Anvin<hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 01/05/2011 09:43 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:32 -0800, David Daney wrote:

This patch will conflict with the MIPS jump label support that Ralf has
queued up for 2.6.38.

Can you disable that support for now? As Linus said at Kernel Summit,
other archs jumped too quickly onto the jump label band wagon. This
change really needs to get in, and IMO, it is more critical to clean up
the jump label code than to have other archs implementing it.


Ralf is really good... perhaps we can get the conflicts resolved?

Yep, the best Git-ish way to handle that is to resolve the conflicts whenever they
happen - i.e. whoever merges his tree upstream later. No need for anyone to 'wait'
or undo anything.


There will be no git conflicts, as the affected files are disjoint. It will be manifested as a build failure for MIPS, which is why I raised the issue.

No matter I guess. We will undoubtedly have many -rc releases in which we can merge any required adjustments.

David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/