Re: perf timechart broken

[Thomas Renninger]

On Tuesday 11 January 2011 15:51:34 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:49:51AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:55:36AM +0100, Thomas Renninger escreveu:
> > > On Tuesday 11 January 2011 02:36:28 Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > It's too late for .37, but it's fine, we just need to add
> > > > a "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx" tag in the patch for it to be
> > > > backported.
> > > I'll submit it to stable@ (it wasn't taken because
> > > the patch which included the fix wasn't mainline yet and I
> > > forgot to submit it for 2.6.37-rcX). 
> >  
> > > I can take care of that, but it would be great if someone could look
> > > at the issue that perf timechart shows: "no trace data in the file" in
> > > x86/tip which seems introduced by one of Arnaldo's latest commits.
> > > Reverting some of his latest patches, solved it for me.
> > 
> > Looking at it now.
> 
> Can you try with this patch applied? We need a better way of specifying
> ordering of __exit and __init routines :-\
I tested on x86/tip and it is fixed.
I explicitly reverted your fix and run into it again.

Thanks!

   Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/