Re: Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 16:42 +0200, Onkalo Samu wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I believe that there are some problems in the scheduling when
> the following happens:
> - Normal priority process locks rt_mutex and sleeps while keeping it
> locked.

There's your fail, don't do that!

> - RT priority process blocks on the rt_mutex while normal priority
> process is sleeping
> 
> This sequence can occur with I2C access when both normal priority
> thread and irq-thread access the same I2C bus. I2C core
> contains rt_mutex and I2C drivers can sleep with wait_for_completion.

Why does I2C core use rt_mutex, that's utterly broken.

> Based on my debugging following sequence occurs (single CPU
> system):
> 
> 1) There is some user process running at the background (like
> cat /dev/zero..)
> 2) User process reads sysfs entry which causes I2C acccess
> 3) User process locks rt_mutex in the I2C-core
> 4) User process sleeps while it keeps rt_mutex locked
> (wait_for_completion in I2C transfer function)

That's where things go wrong, there's absolutely nothing you can do to
fix the system once you block while holding a mutex.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/