Re: [PATCH 0/0] Panic on softdog timeout

[Anithra P Janakiraman]

On 01/18/2011 09:22 PM, Américo Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 06:14:36PM +0530, Anithra P Janakiraman wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > We currently have no way of determining the reason for failure when a
> > softdog timeout occurs. At the minimum a snapshot of the system would
> > help to determine the cause.
> > The attached patch invokes panic on softdog timeout iff kdump is
> > configured, if kdump is not configured it works as usual.
>
> We don't do it in this way, check softlockup_panic, we have
> a boot parameter, i.e. "softlockup_panic=". :)


Some softdog specific scenarios cannot be handled by a softlockup 
detector. We use softdog to watch for critical application failures, 
where it is possible that the application has failed but there isn't a 
softlockup as such.
For e.g. when doing high availability tests on applications, softdog is 
setup so that the timer is reset by an application thread. In case of 
the application failing the timer expires and causes a reboot. In such 
scenarios some information on what caused the  failure would be useful 
and i don't see how softlockup can be used. The patch i had sent would 
be useful in these cases. If I am missing something please do let me know.
I will make the modifications as suggested by Dave Hansen and post the 
patch shortly.

Anithra.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/