Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' byallmodconfig

From: Narendra_K
Date: Thu Jan 20 2011 - 13:43:57 EST


On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:58:48AM +0530, K, Narendra wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 02:39:49AM +0530, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Narendra,
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 20:52:42 +0530 <Narendra_K@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch addresses the build failure described in this thread by
> > > compiling fs/nls/nls_base.c always into vmlinux, thus making the base
> > > nls functions available always.
> >
> > Even on platforms that don't support ACPI or DMI ...
> >
> > You should really restrict this to CONFIG_ACPI || CONFIG_DMI ||
> > CONFIG_NLS ... maybe create a CONFIG_NLS_BASE that is selected by ACPI,
> > DMI and NLS?
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thank you for the suggestions.
>
> I agree with your suggestion that we should compile nls_base.o
> conditionally, only when ACPI || DMI || NLS. I have introduced a bew
> config option CONFIG_NLS_BASE and made ACPI, DMI and NLS select it.
>
> V1 -> V2:
>
> 1. Conditionally compile fs/nls/nls_base.c by introducing a new config
> option CONFIG_NLS_BASE, which is selected by (ACPI || DMI || NLS).
> Behavior of the rest of the files under fs/nls is not changed.
>
> From: Narendra K <narendra_k@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH V2] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig

Hi,

Please let me know if there are any concerns with Version 2 of the patch.
If it looks good please consider it for inclusion.

With regards,
Narendra K
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/