Re: [PATCH 10/10] fs: make aio plug

From: Jens Axboe
Date: Mon Jan 24 2011 - 14:31:49 EST

On 2011-01-24 20:29, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On 2011-01-24 20:15, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>> Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>>> @@ -1698,6 +1701,7 @@ long do_io_submit(aio_context_t ctx_id, long nr,
>>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> + blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>>>>>> aio_batch_free(batch_hash);
>>>>> I'm pretty sure you want blk_finish_plug to run after aio_batch_free.
>>>> You mean to cover the iput()? That's not a bad idea, if that ends up
>>>> writing it out. I did a few read tests here and confirmed it's sending
>>>> down batches of whatever number is submitted.
>>> No, I actually didn't make it all the way through 5/10, so I didn't
>>> realize you got rid of the blk_run_address_space. I agree with the TODO
>>> item to get rid of the aio batching, since it's now taken care of with
>>> the on-stack plugging.
>> Oh, so that was the whole point of the series :-)
> I've said dumber things, I'm sure. =)


>>> As for the iput, I don't think you will get the final iput here, since
>>> you've just scheduled I/O against the file.
>> Good point, so the original comment is moot - it wont make a difference.
>> Still, may not be a bad idea to do the freeing first. I was sort-of
>> hoping to be able to kill the batching in fs/aio.c completely, though...
> Yes, that's what I meant above when I said I agreed with the TODO item.
> Go ahead and nuke it.

Will do, if you promise to help test it :-)

Jens Axboe

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at