Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?
From: Dmitry Torokhov
Date: Mon Jan 24 2011 - 19:56:15 EST
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 07:32:08PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> On 11-01-24 12:54 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:03:47PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> >> As of the 2.6.36 kernel, the userspace commands lsinput and input-kbd
> >> no longer work. And if I grab newer/patched versions of those from the latest
> >> Ubuntu 10.10, then those newer/patched versions do not work with kernels
> >> *before* 2.6.36.
> >> At first glance, this looks like a visible regression.
> >> Is there a version of input-utils that works with both
> >> old and new kernels ?
> > The event protocol number was updated to reflect support of large
> > scancodes, unfortunately some of the utilities expected exact version
> > and refuse to work with updated one.
> So is there a danger of memory corruption if running a binary
> that doesn't check the version number?
No, as far as I know we kept ABI intact.
> In other words, did the size and/or format of returned data
> change for an ioctl() or something here?
Yes, we introduced new ioctls (keeping old ones and their ABI intact).
The change is that EVIOCGVERSION ioctl now returns 0x10001 instead of
> If so, then that is a user-visible regression, and shouldn't happen.
> One correct way to handle that, would be to create a new ioctl(),
> and mark the old one as deprecated, for removal a few years later perhaps.
However a few input utilities insist that they will only work with event
protocol version 0x10000. It is purely their choice, however misguided
it might be.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/