Re: [PATCH 01/32] arm/omap: use system_wq in mailbox
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Tue Jan 25 2011 - 08:47:31 EST
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:24:21AM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Using dedicated workqueue or system_wq doesn't make any difference in
> terms of execution latency anymore. Sleeping work items no longer
> delay execution of other work items. If mailbox is very latency
> sensitive, it might make sense to create a HIGHPRI workqueue but that
> usually isn't necessary.
Ping. Shall I apply the patch?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/