Re: [BUG] Generic syscalls -- chmod vs. fchmodat
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Tue Jan 25 2011 - 13:21:40 EST
On Tuesday 25 January 2011 18:45:15 Roland McGrath wrote:
> I know of no reason to
> think that the current treatment of the empty string was ever intended at
> the creation of the *at interfaces.
I always assumed that this was done so that the *at syscalls can replace
both the ones that take a file descriptor (e.g. fstat) and the ones that
take a pathname (e.g. stat), which is sensible for the non-AT_FDCWD case,
although not documented in the man pages.
Treating the empty string special for AT_FDCWD is rather pointless, but
at least consistent.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/