Re: [PATCH] memsw: handle swapaccount kernel parameter correctly

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:21:58 +0100
Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am sorry but the patch which added swapaccount parameter is not
> correct (we have discussed it https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/16/103).
> I didn't get the way how __setup parameters are handled correctly.
> The patch bellow fixes that.
> 
> I am CCing stable as well because the patch got into .37 kernel.
> 
> ---
> >From 144c2e8aed27d82d48217896ee1f58dbaa7f1f84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:12:41 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] memsw: handle swapaccount kernel parameter correctly
> 
> __setup based kernel command line parameters handled in
> obsolete_checksetup provides the parameter value including = (more
> precisely everything right after the parameter name) so we have to check
> for =0 resp. =1 here. If no value is given then we get an empty string
> rather then NULL.

This doesn't provide a description of the bug which just got fixed.

>From reading the code I think the current behaviour is

"swapaccount": works OK
"noswapaccount": works OK
"swapaccount=0": doesn't do anything
"swapaccount=1": doesn't do anything

but I might be wrong about that.  Please send a changelog update to
clarify all this.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/