Re: [tip:sched/core] sched: Untangle cpu-load and timekeeping code

From: Yong Zhang
Date: Thu Jan 27 2011 - 02:13:22 EST


On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:14 PM, tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
<a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Commit-ID: Â18a57c3b43781ea83c3bb21c3add84ba890d5fb3
> Gitweb: Â Â http://git.kernel.org/tip/18a57c3b43781ea83c3bb21c3add84ba890d5fb3
> Author: Â Â Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> AuthorDate: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:30:35 +0100
> Committer: ÂIngo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> CommitDate: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:33:23 +0100
>
> sched: Untangle cpu-load and timekeeping code
>
> Remove the calc_global_load() call from the timekeeping code and make
> it local to the scheduler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

Now another question comes into my head:

Previous we stop load calculation only when we goes to full idle,
say every CPU goes to idle. tick_do_timer_cpu is jumping to
the no-idle one so we can always get the real load.

But now, if the CPU on which the global_load_timer resident
goes to idle and there is still no-idle cpu in system, the load
calculation stops. So it's not reflecting the real load after
that.

Thanks,
Yong

--
Only stand for myself
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/