Re: [ANNOUNCE] undertaker 1.0

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> [2] http://www4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/Research/VAMOS/linux-trees/

Nice effort.

I had a quick look into kernel/irq/

The red section in irqdesc.c

280 #if defined(CONFIG_KSTAT_IRQS_ONDEMAND)

is indeed dead code.

The one in manage.c is not:

 921 #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_RELEASE_METHOD

CONFIG_IRQ_RELEASE_METHOD is set by arch/um. Ditto for include/linux/irq.h

It'd be nice if the web interface would have a knob to jump to the
next red section. Scrolling through is annoying.

Thanks,

	tglx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/