Re: [PATCH 02/10] ptrace: remove the extra wake_up_process() fromptrace_detach()

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Mon Jan 31 2011 - 05:39:05 EST


On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:46:01AM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> NAK. Let's have the wake_up_state(task, TASK_TRACED|TASK_STOPPED) version
> go in first. That one will be more appropriate for -stable. Even if we
> shortly remove it entirely in mainline, having the more conservative
> intermediate state in the git history will make any future problems more
> susceptible to bisection.

Yeap, sounds reasonable. So, you're saying it can go away but should
be converted to safer sleep first, right? I'll resequence the patches.

Thank you.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at