Re: x25: possible skb leak on bad facilities

[John Hughes]

On 31/01/11 14:08, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Looking at the changes introduced in the commit below, we seem to
> introduce an skb leak when a packet with bad facilities are present:
>
>      commit a6331d6f9a4298173b413cf99a40cc86a9d92c37
>      Author: andrew hendry<andrew.hendry@xxxxxxxxx>
>      Date:   Wed Nov 3 12:54:53 2010 +0000
>
>          memory corruption in X.25 facilities parsing
>
> If I am understanding things correctly then we trigger a -1 return to
> the main packet dispatch loop, this being non-zero implies that we have
> requeued the skb and it should not be freed.  As it was not requeued,
> I believe the skb is no longer referenced and then is leaked.
>
> Perhaps someone better aquainted with this code could review my analysis
> in the patch leader below.  If accurate I believe we need the patch below
> to resolve this.  If it is not then I suspect a comment is required on
> the -1 return.
>
> Thoughts?
>    
Sadly, after nearly 30 years (1982-2010) we've just closed our last X.25 
line so I can no longer test this.

Sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/