[PATCH 09/28] sched: Do not consider SCHED_IDLE tasks to be cachehot

From: stable-bot for Nikhil Rao
Date: Thu Feb 10 2011 - 07:30:05 EST


Commit: ef8002f6848236de5adc613063ebeabddea8a6fb upstream
Author: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Wed Oct 13 12:09:35 2010 -0700

This patch adds a check in task_hot to return if the task has SCHED_IDLE
policy. SCHED_IDLE tasks have very low weight, and when run with regular
workloads, are typically scheduled many milliseconds apart. There is no
need to consider these tasks hot for load balancing.

Signed-off-by: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
LKML-Reference: <1287173550-30365-2-git-send-email-ncrao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 87e3b2b..0a1fb24 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2014,6 +2014,9 @@ task_hot(struct task_struct *p, u64 now, struct sched_domain *sd)
if (p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class)
return 0;

+ if (unlikely(p->policy == SCHED_IDLE))
+ return 0;
+
/*
* Buddy candidates are cache hot:
*/
--
1.7.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/