Re: [PATCH 1/1, v7] cgroup/freezer: add per freezer duty ratio control

[Arjan van de Ven]

On 2/13/2011 4:44 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:29:07 -0800
> Matt Helsley<matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:10:44AM -0800, jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > From: Jacob Pan<jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Freezer subsystem is used to manage batch jobs which can start
> > > stop at the same time. However, sometime it is desirable to let
> > > the kernel manage the freezer state automatically with a given
> > > duty ratio.
> > > For example, if we want to reduce the time that backgroup apps
> > > are allowed to run we can put them into a freezer subsystem and
> > > set the kernel to turn them THAWED/FROZEN at given duty ratio.
> > >
> > > This patch introduces two file nodes under cgroup
> > > freezer.duty_ratio_pct and freezer.period_sec
> > Again: I don't think this is the right approach in the long term.
> > It would be better not to add this interface and instead enable the
> > cpu cgroup subsystem for non-rt tasks using a similar duty ratio
> > concept..
> >
> > Nevertheless, I've added some feedback on the code for you here :).
> AFAIK, there was a work for bandwidth control in CFS.
>
> http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2010-10/msg04335.html
>
> I tested this and worked fine. This schduler approach seems better for
> my purpose to limit bandwidth of apprications rather than freezer.

for our purpose, it's not about bandwidth.
it's about making sure the class of apps don't run for a long period 
(30-second range) of time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/