Re: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration

[Ingo Molnar]

* Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:35:06AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On 02/14/2011 11:30 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:07:02AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > >> Never mind. will send out patch after your patches get merged into tip.
> > > 
> > > Alright, fair enough.
> > > 
> > >> BTW, you may need to rebase your on top of tip/master.
> > > 
> > > Yeah, I saw a new patch going into the numa branch, but shouldn't this
> > > and the next series based on x86/numa?  That was how it was done with
> > > the previous series.
> > 
> > there is patch about init_memory_mapping_high() in tip/x86/bootmem.
> > it will put pgtable on local nodes.
> 
> Ingo, hpa, how do you guys want to handle this?  Maybe you can cherry
> pick or pull the branch into x86/numa?

Would be nice to have a version against the latest tip:x86/numa tree, the current 
one conflicts in arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c with your tree. Also, i suspect you want to 
propagate Yinghai's Acked-by's into the commits?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/