Re: [PATCH 1/1] ptrace: make sure do_wait() won't hang afterPTRACE_ATTACH

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 02/20, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 18:06:30 +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
> > Not exactly. Even after we fix kernel so that it properly preserves
> > group-stop across ptrace-stops, gdb will still see TWO
> > waitpid:SIGSTOP events, not one.
> >
> > First one says "the tracee has received SIGSTOP", and after PTRACE_CONT(SIGSTOP),
> > second one says "the tracee has stopped because of SIGSTOP".
> > Currently, neither strace nor gdb understands that second one
> > is different from first.
>
> I thought the kernel change being discussed should be the second SIGSTOP will
> receive the process's original parent,

No, no, the debugger should see this notification whatever we do.

> so that CTRL-Z on a debugged process
> from shell works the normal way, as without a debugger.

Yes, this is yet another problem (din't I say we have a lot of them? ;),
CTRL-Z should work and thus we have notify original parent as well.
And even this is not enough, we should change do_wait(WSTOPPED).
But this is another story, gdb shouldn't be affected by these changes.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/