[PATCH] of/pdt: allow DT device matching by fixing 'name'brokenness (v3)

From: Andres Salomon
Date: Wed Feb 23 2011 - 19:34:53 EST



Commit e2f2a93b changed dp->name from using the 'name' property to
using package-to-path. This fixed /proc/device-tree creation by
eliminating conflicts between names (the 'name' property provides
names like 'battery', whereas package-to-path provides names like
'/foo/bar/battery@0', which we stripped to 'battery@0'). However,
it also breaks of_device_id table matching.

The fix that we _really_ wanted was to keep dp->name based upon
the name property ('battery'), but based dp->full_name upon
package-to-path ('battery@0'). This patch does just that.

This also changes OLPC behavior to use the full result from
package-to-path for full_name, rather than stripping the directory
out. In practice, the strings end up being exactly the same; this
change saves time, code, and memory.

v2: combine two patches and revert of_pdt_node_name to original version
v3: use dp->phandle instead of passing around node

Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/of/pdt.c | 37 ++++++++++++-------------------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/pdt.c b/drivers/of/pdt.c
index 28295d0..c4cadeb 100644
--- a/drivers/of/pdt.c
+++ b/drivers/of/pdt.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static char * __init of_pdt_get_one_property(phandle node, const char *name)

static char * __init of_pdt_try_pkg2path(phandle node)
{
- char *res, *buf = NULL;
+ char *buf = NULL;
int len;

if (!of_pdt_prom_ops->pkg2path)
@@ -147,29 +147,6 @@ static char * __init of_pdt_try_pkg2path(phandle node)
pr_err("%s: package-to-path failed\n", __func__);
return NULL;
}
-
- res = strrchr(buf, '/');
- if (!res) {
- pr_err("%s: couldn't find / in %s\n", __func__, buf);
- return NULL;
- }
- return res+1;
-}
-
-/*
- * When fetching the node's name, first try using package-to-path; if
- * that fails (either because the arch hasn't supplied a PROM callback,
- * or some other random failure), fall back to just looking at the node's
- * 'name' property.
- */
-static char * __init of_pdt_build_name(phandle node)
-{
- char *buf;
-
- buf = of_pdt_try_pkg2path(node);
- if (!buf)
- buf = of_pdt_get_one_property(node, "name");
-
return buf;
}

@@ -187,7 +164,7 @@ static struct device_node * __init of_pdt_create_node(phandle node,

kref_init(&dp->kref);

- dp->name = of_pdt_build_name(node);
+ dp->name = of_pdt_get_one_property(node, "name");
dp->type = of_pdt_get_one_property(node, "device_type");
dp->phandle = node;

@@ -203,6 +180,16 @@ static char * __init of_pdt_build_full_name(struct device_node *dp)
int len, ourlen, plen;
char *n;

+ /*
+ * When fetching the full name we want the name we see with
+ * package-to-path (ie, '/foo/bar/battery@0') rather than what
+ * we see with the name property (ie, 'battery').
+ */
+ n = of_pdt_try_pkg2path(dp->phandle);
+ if (n)
+ return n;
+
+ /* Older method for determining full name */
plen = strlen(dp->parent->full_name);
ourlen = strlen(of_pdt_node_name(dp));
len = ourlen + plen + 2;
--
1.7.2.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/