Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the acpi tree
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Thu Feb 24 2011 - 05:30:24 EST
On Thursday, February 24, 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c between commit
> a69fa313606a51cee99d802c14895330948f60c8 ("ACPI / PM: Drop
> acpi_restore_state_mem()") from the acpi tree and commit
> d1ee433539ea5963a8f946f3428b335d1c5fdb20 ("x86, trampoline: Use the
> unified trampoline setup for ACPI wakeup") from the tip tree.
> Just context (I think).
Yes. The ACPI tree renames a function that the x86 tree modifies.
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
Please do, thanks!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/