RE: Interrupt Latencies

[Thomas Gleixner]

Frank,

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Schaefer Dr, Frank-Rene () wrote:

> In response to Thomas Gleixner:
> 
> > Interrupt latency depends on various factors:
> > 
> >   - Interrupt disabled code regions
> Could you tell us how this could be detected or measured?
> Is there a central place, where we could toggle a pin to 
> see when interrupts are enabled/disabled? 

ftrace allows you to analyse that.
 
> >   - Concurrent interrupts and the ordering of handling
> We are only considering the best times that we measure.

Ok.

> >   - Deep idle states
> You mean 'suspend' or some type of CPU sleep. Could you elaborate?
> We do not suspend. This should also only be the case for the 
> first chunk that is transmitted. But the latencies remain
> over longer time spans.

NOHZ idle can push the cpu into deeper power states (C2/C3). But there
are also BIOSes which do agressive power management behind the kernels
back.

Turn off CONFIG_NOHZ and add "processor.max_cstate=1" to the kernel
command line. You might also try "idle=poll" for a test.
 
> >   - Bus contention
> Nothing else is running. 

That does not guarantee anything. Think DMA.

> > How is that interrupt connected to the CPU/chipset? 
> The port is part of the chipset connected internally 
> via PCI.
> 
> > Which driver(s) is/are involved ? 
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/gpio/pl061.c
> 
> > How is the pin OUT accessed from the driver?
> gpio_set_value(Pin, Value);
> 
> we measured the delay and could find that it was in the range
> of some nano seconds.

Is the SPI controller part of the chipset or comes the interrupt via
one of the GPIOs as well?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/