Re: ANNOUNCE: debloat-testing kernel git tree
From: Sedat Dilek
Date: Sun Feb 27 2011 - 10:38:27 EST
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Dave TÃht <d@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:22 PM, John W. Linville
>> <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> The bufferbloat project  is pleased to announce the availability
>>> of the debloat-testing Linux kernel git tree:
>>> Â git://git.infradead.org/debloat-testing.git
>> it should be "localversion-debloat" in the commit-subject in  (not
>> "localversion-wireless") :-). Â"-db" as suffix is IMHO not very
>> meaningful... Why not add simply a suffix called "-debloat"? Â(Anyway,
>> I will revert this patch because I don't want to have any suffix added
>> I have several other questions, but I start compiling first and test
>> this debloat kernel.
> Excellent. At moment I would recommend building "low latency preempt
> desktop" kernels with a high HZ value (400 or 1000), enabling highres
> timers, and compiling in SFB as a module. (I'd like the default for SFB
> to be "m" rather than "n", too)
>> - Sedat -
>>  "Add localversion-wireless to identify builds from this tree."
>> Bloat-devel mailing list
> Dave Taht
These "debloat guys" are fast :-).
I was just preparing my build-system (which I normally use to
debianize linux-next kernels).
Any other recommendation for kernel-config options?
linux-next has already CONFIG_NET_SCH_CHOKE (but I have unset it).
Which commits are in debloat-testing GIT but not in linux-next tree?
Are you planning debloat feature for 2.6.39?
- Sedat -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/