Re: brk() should check randomize_va_space rather thenCONFIG_COMPAT_BRK

From: Jiri Kosina
Date: Mon Feb 28 2011 - 09:29:49 EST


On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Frank Heckenbach wrote:

> The brk() syscall checks CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK to decide whether the brk
> area starts just after the end of the code+bss.
>
> Since CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK can be overridden by
> /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space, it should rather check this
> variable (which is initialized in mm/memory.c from
> CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK), see the patch below.
>
> I've tested it with an old libc5 binary: Without the patch, if the
> kernel was configured without CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK, the first malloc()
> fails with any setting of randomize_va_space. With the patch
> applied, the program runs correctly with randomize_va_space < 2, but
> not with randomize_va_space == 2, as it should be.
>
> --- linux-2.6.37.2/mm/mmap.c.orig 2011-02-25 00:09:00.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.37.2/mm/mmap.c 2011-02-26 01:13:53.000000000 +0100
> @@ -252,11 +252,11 @@
>
> down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK
> - min_brk = mm->end_code;
> -#else
> - min_brk = mm->start_brk;
> -#endif
> + if (randomize_va_space < 2)
> + min_brk = mm->end_code;
> + else
> + min_brk = mm->start_brk;
> +
> if (brk < min_brk)
> goto out;

Hi Frank,

how do you avoid race here?

More precisely -- randomize_va_space can be changed in runtime, when
already running processess have been started with different
randomize_va_space value (and thus the shifting of mm->brk already
happened in arch_randomize_brk())

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/