Re: [PATCH] perf_events: update PEBS event constraints (v2)

[Ingo Molnar]

* Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 04:20 +0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >> This patch updates PEBS event constraints for Intel Atom, Nehalem, Westmere.
> >>
> >> This patch also reorganizes the PEBS format/constraint detection code. It is
> >> now based on processor model and not PEBS format. Two processors may use the
> >> same PEBS format without have the same list of PEBS events.
> >>
> >> In this second version, we simplified the initialization of the PEBS constraints
> >> by leveraging the existing switch() statement in perf_event_intel.c. We also
> >> renamed the constraint tables to be more consistent with regular constraints.
> >
> > Hi, Stephane
> >
> > Nice updates.
> > Wondering where did you get these PEBS event constraints? I didn't find
> > these in the latest manual.
> >
> Yeah, the manual is lacking some information. The other source of information
> is the PTU event files (whatif.intel.com).

Plus i suspect you have performed testing on affected CPUs as well?

If yes then i think we want to push these fixes via perf/urgent - they seem to 
nicely round up the constraints.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/