Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] mm: Change flush_tlb_range() to take anmm_struct

[David Miller]

From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 12:22:37 -0500

> I'm finding it hard to understand how the Sparc code handles icache
> coherence.  It seems that the Spitfire MMU is the interesting one, but the
> hard case seems to be when a process migrates around to various cores
> during execution (thus leaving incoherent icache lines everywhere), and the
> page is then freed and re-used for different executable code.  I'd think
> that there would have to be xcall IPIs to flush all the cpus' icaches, or
> to flush every core in the cpu_vm_mask plus do something at context switch,
> but I don't see any of that.  No doubt I'm missing something :-)

flush_dcache_page() remembers the cpu that wrote to the page (in the
page flags), and cross-calls to that specific cpu.

It is only that cpu which must flush his I-cache, since all other cpus
saw the write on the bus and updated their I-cache lines as a result.

See, in the sparc64 case, the incoherency issue is purely local to the
store.  The problem case is specifically the local I-cache not seeing
local writes, everything else is fine.  CPU I-caches see writes done
by other cpus, just not those done by the local cpu.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/