Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] gpiolib: Add ability to get GPIO direction

From: Peter Tyser
Date: Sun Mar 06 2011 - 22:07:58 EST


On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 00:30 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 05:28:18PM -0600, Peter Tyser wrote:
> > Add a new get_direction() function to the gpio_chip structure. This is
> > useful so that the direction of a GPIO can be determined when its
> > initially exported. Previously, the direction defaulted to "unknown"
> > regardless of the actual configuration of the GPIO.
> >
> > If a GPIO driver implements get_direction(), it is called in
> > gpio_request() to set the initial direction of the GPIO accurately.
>
> I don't like this approach. It effectively creates two methods for
> determining the direction of a gpio; either ask the driver, or read
> the flags value. Currently, only gpio_request() actually uses the
> first option, but it still leaves the ambiguity.
>
> Instead, the driver should be able to preload the direction flag at or
> shortly after gpiochip_add() time. No need for a new callback hook
> from what I can see.

The callback hook was used because the gpio_desc[] structure was local
to gpiolib.c. The code would have to be restructured a bit to allow
drivers to set the flags themselves. I can do that if you'd prefer, but
don't think it'd be all that much cleaner.

Also, I thought it made sense to read the direction of the GPIO in
gpio_request() because that's the point that the GPIO comes under the
GPIO subsystem's control. Prior to that, there's a chance the direction
could be changed by platform code, or another driver, etc, so reading
the direction in gpiochip_add() may result in out-of-date directions.

The reading of the direction could also be put in chip drivers'
request() function. That would get rid of the callback and still ensure
the direction is up-to-date.

I think the current patch seems cleaner than the alternatives, but will
change if you'd prefer.

Best,
Peter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/