RE: [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: mx51: Implement code to allow mx51 to enterWFI

[Nguyen Dinh-R00091]

Hi Arnaud,


>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-
>bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Arnaud Patard
>Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 10:02 AM
>To: Nguyen Dinh-R00091
>Cc: linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Vaidyanathan
>Ranjani-RA5478; u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang Lily-R58066; linux-arm-
>kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: mx51: Implement code to allow mx51 to enter WFI
>
>Nguyen Dinh-R00091 <R00091@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Hi Arnaud,
>
>Hi,
>>
>> Just to verify that you are testing on an MX51-Babbage board? Here's my log:
>
>I never said I was testing on babbage. The reason is because I'm using a
>efika smartbook and not a babbage.
>
>>
>> root@freescale ~$ uname -a
>> Linux freescale 2.6.38-rc1+ #93 Fri Mar 4 17:18:15 CST 2011 armv7l GNU/Linux
>
>2.6.38-rc1+ ? which tree are you using ? The for-next branch of Sascha
>Hauer's tree is at least 2.6.38-rc5 so you're trying to merge something
>without even testing it on the current tree. Can you please test suspend
>with current imx for-next tree (with no other patches than theses 2
>patches if possible), in order to make sure that it's still working with it ?
>

The current imx for-next tree is not booting on my Babbage board. Is it okay for you with your HW. I'll have to debug the booting part first.

>Thanks,
>Arnaud
>
>_______________________________________________
>linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/