Re: + sysctl-add-proc_dointvec_unsigned-handler.patch added to -mm tree

From: Dave Young
Date: Tue Mar 08 2011 - 00:43:38 EST


On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:05:43PM -0800, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> Add a proc_dointvec_unsigned() sysctl handler for positive value cases.
>>
>>> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c~sysctl-add-proc_dointvec_unsigned-handler
>>> +++ a/kernel/sysctl.c
>>
>>> +int proc_dointvec_unsigned(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
>>> +{
>>> + Â Â struct do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv_param param = {
>>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â .min = &zero,
>>> + Â Â };
>>> + Â Â return do_proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos,
>>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv, &param);
>>> +}
>>
>> This silently ignored max value in .extra2 .
>
> Hi,
>
> Good cache, should set .max = NULL here

Oh, c99 set default value to 0, isn't it?

What do you mean silently ignore here?

Let's see the code:

if ((param->min && *param->min > val) ||
(param->max && *param->max < val))
return -EINVAL;

There's no problem max == NULL

--
Regards
dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/