Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Dave,

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:56:12 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 22:53:12 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:31:35 +1100
> > > 
> > > > Maybe some config option changed ...
> > > 
> > > Perhaps GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED?
> > 
> > Yep, that has been turned on for powerpc now.  I guess you will have the
> > same problem on sparc64 of you merge the net-next and sparc trees ...
> 
> Yeah, powerpc alone compiles with GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED as it
> does not have that notify commit.
> 
> If you add net which has that notify commit, but not the fix it
> breaks. I wonder whether Dave should pick that fix into net.

So, if you merge the commit 1fb0ef31f428 ("genirq: Fix affinity notifier
fallout") from the tip tree, you will get exactly one new commit and will
fix your tree properly with no adverse effect on anyone else.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature