Re: Regression from 2.6.36
From: Dave Jones
Date: Wed Mar 16 2011 - 20:53:29 EST
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 05:15:19PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Do you need any other information from me ? I'm able to try other versions or
> > patches but, please, take into account that I have to do this on _production_
> > server (I failed to reproduce it in testing environment). Also, I'm able to try
> > only one kernel per day.
> Ick, one kernel per day might make this a bit difficult, but if there
> was any way you could use 'git bisect' to try to narrow this down to the
> patch that caused this problem, it would be great.
> You can mark 2.6.35 as working and 2.6.36 as bad and git will go from
> there and try to offer you different chances to find the problem.
Comparing the output of a perf profile between the good/bad kernels might
narrow it down faster than a bisect if something obvious sticks out.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/