Re: [RFC][PATCH v2]: PCI: PCIe links may not get configured for ASPMunder POWERSAVE mode

[Kenji Kaneshige]

(2011/03/18 13:21), Naga Chumbalkar wrote:
> v2 ->  v1:
> 	. Kept the logic in pci_raw_set_power_state
> 	. Changed the ASPM enabling logic
> 	. Modified the text that describes the problem
>
> v1	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130013164703283&w=2
>
> The assumption made in commit 41cd766b065970ff6f6c89dd1cf55fa706c84a3d
> (PCI: Don't enable aspm before drivers have had a chance to veto it) that
> pci_enable_device() will result in re-configuring ASPM when aspm_policy is
> POWERSAVE is no longer valid.  This is due to commit
> 97c145f7c87453cec90e91238fba5fe2c1561b32 (PCI: read current power state
> at enable time) which resets dev->current_state to D0. This makes the
> equality check (below) become true, so pcie_aspm_pm_state_change() never
> gets called.
> ./drivers/pci/pci.c: pci_raw_set_pci_power_state()
> 546         /* Check if we're already there */
> 547         if (dev->current_state == state)
> 548                 return 0;
>
> So OSPM doesnn't configure the PCIe links for ASPM.
>
> The patch below does the following:
> At the end of each Root Bridge scan make a call to configure ASPM when the
> ASPM policy is set to "powersave" mode. Note that if a previous pass had
> completed the configuration for all devices under that Bridge then the
> configuration will not take place again because pcie_config_aspm_link()
> checks to see if the link is already in the requested state.
> We won't reconfigure ASPM when _OSC control is not granted.

Which _OSC controls do we need for configuring ASPM?

Regards,
Kenji Kaneshige

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/