Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] WARN_ON_SMP(): Allow use in if statements on UP
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri Mar 18 2011 - 08:28:17 EST
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 08:14 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 10:12 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 17:56 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > + * WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&lock)) checks, as spin_is_locked()
> > > + * returns 0 for uniprocessor settings.
> > Arguably most spin_is_locked() usages should be removed in favour of
> > something like lockdep_assert_held().
> > The latter only emits code then built with lockdep enabled and it checks
> > we are indeed the owner, not some random other cpu.
> Perhaps we should have lockdep_assert_held() also be in
Can't since its got stronger requirements.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/