Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets
From: Mark Brown
Date: Fri Mar 18 2011 - 11:15:16 EST
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:00:09PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 18 March 2011, Andy Green wrote:
> > What's the plan for leveraging that level of generality on "dynamically
> > probed devices"? I mean I know what I want to use this for and the
> > platform_data scheme covers all the soldered-on-the-board cases fine.
> Isn't there also a device tree based OMAP tree that can boot on
> Panda and is just waiting to get merged?
Did the stuff with multiple interrupt controllers get resolved? That's
pretty important for practical use. There have been quite a few
iterations of the device tree patches for ARM over the last release but
the iterations I looked at all seemed to be bugfix type stuff.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/