Re: [PATCH] r8169: fix a bug in rtl8169_init_phy()
From: Piotr Hosowicz
Date: Sat Mar 19 2011 - 13:03:55 EST
On 19.03.2011 17:38, Anca Emanuel wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Piotr Hosowicz<piotr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 19.03.2011 17:04, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 Ã 16:49 +0100, Piotr Hosowicz a Ãcrit :
I do not understand. I reverted the commit you mentioned and am building
now. Will it suffice?
1) Revert the commit
OK. This is what I've done and everything is OK, net works as usual. But
what should I do next? Will the revert be done on the GIT server? And when?
I try not to clone to much and wastefuly. And am new to GIT so sorry for the
Next: Test Eric's patch, and send and email with Tested-by tag.
I just built the kernel with the commit reverted as Eric said in the
beginning and it works. Should I build again with patching in place of
reverting and report it? Is the method same as ordinary patching?
Sygnaturka utworzona wyÅÄcznie ze zrecyklingowanych literek
najwyÅszej jakoÅci poddanych procesowi starannej selekcji.
NP: Big Big Train - The Underfall Yard
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/