Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Test for kmalloc/memset(0) pairs
From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Sun Mar 20 2011 - 07:06:48 EST
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Indeed that one seems to be quite out of date. You can get the most
>> recent version here: https://launchpad.net/~npalix/+archive/coccinelle
> With tools/coccinelle/ you would never run into such problems of distributing
> the latest stable version to your fellow kernel developers: it would always be
> available in tools/coccinelle/.
> Integration, synergy, availability, distribution and half a dozen other
> buzzwords come to mind as to why it's a good idea to have kernel-focused
> tools hosted in the kernel repo :-)
> IMO it's an option to consider.
That's my thinking too. Yes, 80 KLOC of OCaml in the kernel tree
sounds crazy but I think the practical advantages might be enough to
justify it. Btw, would git-submodule be something to consider here?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/