Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Tue Mar 22 2011 - 21:04:12 EST
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 22:37 +0000, Andy Green wrote:
> > that a device-tree based approach is much better in the long run
> > more flexible) despite Andy odd quasi-religious aversion for it.
> As Mark Brown wrote earlier about this, the Device Tree
> just isn't there in mainline".
Right and will take even longer to get there as long as short sighted
people like yourself appear to run some kind of religious battle against
it for no good technical reason that I can fathom so far.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/