Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: avoid atomic operation in test_and_set_bit_lockif possible

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > One good way to see cache bounces is to run a misses/accesses ratio profile:
> >
> >    perf top -e cache-misses -e cache-references --count-filter 10
> >
> > Note the two events: this runs a 'weighted' profile, you'll see (LLC) 
> > cache-misses of a function relative to cache-references it does, a 
> > misses/references ratio in essence.
> 
> If anyone does this on a Nehalem please only use 2.6.39-rc*+ which
> includes the offcore patches. Anything before that will get you complete
> bogus numbers.

In that case the second example i quoted can be used:

  perf top -e L1-dcache-store-misses -e L1-dcache-stores --count-filter 10

Or:

  perf top -e L1-dcache-load-misses -e L1-dcache-loads --count-filter 10

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/