Re: [RFC PATCHv2 1/4] drivers/otp: add initial support for OTP memory

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Saturday 26 March 2011 03:16:48 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 20:21, Jamie Iles wrote:
> > For the actual ioctl() we should assume byte addressing rather than
> > words though and do the conversion in the driver so we can cope with
> > devices that don't have 64-bit words and do the locking on a looping
> > word-by-word basis.
> >
> >        struct otp_lock_req {
> >                __u32   start_addr;
> >                __u32   byte_count;
> >        };

Looks good to me.

> i would add an ABI field here too so if in the future we want to add
> stuff, we can do so without adding new ioctls.  like "u16 version; u16
> flags;".  then in the ioctl, if version isnt 0, we return ENOTSUP.  in
> the future, we can add flags or bump the version.

No, versioned APIs are just a pain to maintain, it's easier to add
new ioctl commands when necessary.
Note that the kernel would always have to support all versions of
the API anyway.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/