Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ata: pata_at91.c bugfix for initial_timinginitialisation

From: Igor Plyatov
Date: Mon Mar 28 2011 - 12:32:06 EST


Hello Sergei!

> Hello.
>
> Igor Plyatov wrote:
>
> > The "struct ata_timing" must contain 10 members, but ".dmack_hold" member was
> > forgotten for "initial_timing" initialisation. This patch fixes such a problem.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Plyatov <plyatov@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/ata/pata_at91.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
> > index 0da0dcc..0267d54 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
> > @@ -49,8 +49,18 @@ struct at91_ide_info {
> > void __iomem *alt_addr;
> > };
> >
> > -static const struct ata_timing initial_timing =
> > - {XFER_PIO_0, 70, 290, 240, 600, 165, 150, 600, 0};
> > +static const struct ata_timing initial_timing = {
> > + .mode = XFER_PIO_0,
> > + .setup = 70,
> > + .act8b = 290,
> > + .rec8b = 240,
> > + .cyc8b = 600,
> > + .active = 165,
> > + .recover = 150,
> > + .dmack_hold = 0,
> > + .cycle = 600,
> > + .udma = 0
> > +};
>
> There's no need to explicitly initialize to 0.
>
> MBR, Sergei

It's much better to explicitly initialise, then use old wrong code,
where .dmack_hold member was equal to 600.

Best regards!
--
Igor Plyatov


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/