Re: [PATCH] Use the environment variable PYTHON if defined

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 02:15:30PM -0500, Michael Witten escreveu:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 13:15, Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > the patch submitted by Michael seems to be taking care of far
> > more cases than mine, so that is much better.
> 
> One major issue with my current patch is that I opted to stop the
> build with an error message even when using the default python command
> names; is this undesirable? Is it better to fail silently as before
> (via the somewhat cryptic Python.h message), or is it better to force
> the user to specify that no python support should be built?

I think that the best course of action is to emit a warning and go, i.e.
we don't have to make it harder for people that don't want $FOO support
to make that clear.

Just not having python-dev{el} installed should be enough to disable the
feature. For people that want the feature the warning is enough to tell
them to install the missing package.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/